“I AM THE WALRUS!” coo coo ka choo… just thinking this reply to self stood on its own in my new post course blog conitinuum!

Again using Platonic/Socratic dialogue; show me the Pius so I might know how to be Pius, show me the moral so I may be moral, show me cosmopolitan so I may be cosmopolitan, show me the tolerant of diversity so I may be tolerant, show me the generous so I may be generous, show me democracy so I may be democratic, show me the cognitional of mans effects on the world so I may be cognicent. I only have to look in the mirror that see`s out the window behind me as I live in the place that is most cognicent of cosmopolitan, universality, diversity, generosity, moral and just, democratic, and socially conscious of mans negative affects/effects on the environment and the world. Should I be modeling or emulating?

We as a Nation spend the largest part of GDP on Education, Social Welfare and Health Care in the world, we contribute more than any other to the U.N., we are the most generous privately and Nationally to all other Nations, we are the most Democratic, we work diligently on diversity and multi multiculturalism, we have religious and speech freedom built into our constitution, we continuously examine and adjust through voting on the local, state, and national level our own mores, values and norms as we evolve.

Again show me cosmopolitan and universalism so I may aspire to be that which I am not? If I am average why would I aspire to remain there, if I am exceptional why would I aspire to be average, if I do not aspire then I am just existing, if I am just existing do I matter, if I do not matter am I existing, If I achieve exceptional-ism while remaining fair, moral, rational, just, reasoned and with humility is that not exceptional? I do not define exceptional for any other than self as actualization is personal and ones definition of success is subjective but I allow that part of exceptional includes not having exceptions and includes inclusiveness for any to aspire to their own idea of without my policing of their ideas.

I am you and you are me and we are we, and I am me and you are you and we are we! Finally;Time is only relevant to the clock watcher, its the moments that matter, the past is the present and the future and the moment is what you make of it in context of the past and the future, but the moment is the only relevant or real time, everything before and after is a contingent not a construct.
Reply